DEFICIENT, CONGESTED ROADWAYS COST AVERAGE SACRAMENTO AREA DRIVER NEARLY $2,300 ANNUALLY, A TOTAL OF $53.6 BILLION STATEWIDE. COSTS WILL RISE AND TRANSPORTATION WOES WILL WORSEN WITHOUT INCREASED FUNDING
Eds.: The report includes regional pavement condition, congestion levels, highway safety data, and cost breakdowns for the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco-Oakland and San Jose urban areas. Info-graphics for each area can be downloaded here: TRIP California Info-graphics.
Sacramento, CA – Roads and bridges that are deficient, congested or lack desirable safety features cost California motorists a total of $53.6 billion statewide annually - $2,270 per driver in the Sacramento urban area - due to higher vehicle operating costs, traffic crashes and congestion-related delays. Increased investment in transportation improvements at the local, state and federal levels could relieve traffic congestion, improve road, bridge and transit conditions, boost safety, and support long-term economic growth in California, according to a new report released today by TRIP, a Washington, DC based national transportation organization.
The TRIP report, “California Transportation by the Numbers: Meeting the State’s Need for Safe, Smooth and Efficient Mobility,” finds that throughout California, 37 percent of major locally and state-maintained roads are in poor condition. One quarter of California’s bridges are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. The state’s major urban roads are becoming increasingly congested, with drivers wasting significant amounts of time and fuel each year. And, more than 14,000 people were killed in crashes on California’s roads from 2010 to 2014.
Driving on deficient roads costs each Sacramento area driver $2,270 per year in the form of extra vehicle operating costs (VOC) as a result of driving on roads in need of repair, lost time and fuel due to congestion-related delays, and the costs of traffic crashes in which roadway features likely were a contributing factor. The TRIP report calculates the cost to motorists of insufficient roads in the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco-Oakland and San Jose urban areas. A breakdown of the costs per motorist in each area along with a statewide total is below.
The TRIP report finds that 68 percent of major roads in the Sacramento urban area are in poor or mediocre condition, costing the average motorist an additional $638 each year in extra vehicle operating costs, including accelerated vehicle depreciation, additional repair costs, and increased fuel consumption and tire wear.
"The TRIP report confirms what everyone in California knows: the transportation system in this state is in bad shape,” said Will Kempton, executive director of Transportation California. “It is past time for our elected officials in Sacramento to step up and deal with this problem."
Traffic congestion in the Sacramento area is worsening, causing 43 annual hours of delay for the average motorist and costing each driver $958 annually in lost time and wasted fuel.
“There is a backlog of street and road repair projects of over $1 billion in Sacramento County,” said Kerri Howell, chair of the Sacramento Transportation Authority. “That is exactly why Measure B, the ½ cent transportation sales tax, is on the November ballot. We need to do our part locally to ensure that we have a stable source of revenue to fund key projects and compete for state and federal matching funds.”
A total of 25 percent of California’s bridges show significant deterioration or do not meet modern design standards. Eight percent of California’s bridges are structurally deficient, with significant deterioration to the bridge deck, supports or other major components. An additional 17 percent of the state’s bridges are functionally obsolete, which means they no longer meet modern design standards, often because of narrow lanes, inadequate clearances or poor alignment. In the Sacramento urban area, nine percent of bridges are structurally deficient and 15 percent are functionally obsolete.
“Aging infrastructure and a growing population have placed increased pressure on our transportation network,” said Jerry Way, public works director for the City of Sacramento. “We can’t ignore these demands and must make new investments now to prepare for the future. Safe and secure roads, bridges and public transit are necessary to support our local economic growth.”
Traffic crashes in California claimed the lives of 14,437 people between 2010 and 2014. California’s overall traffic fatality rate of 0.92 fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles of travel is lower than the national average of 1.08. The fatality rate on California’s rural non-Interstate roads was 2.72 fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles of travel in 2014, nearly four times higher than the 0.70 fatality rate on all other roads and highways in the state.
“We are throttled by a severe lack of funding,” said Tom Holsman, chief executive officer for the Associated General Contractors of California. “The economic benefits of smart infrastructure investment create jobs, improve productivity to move goods, and lay the groundwork for increased efficiency in the future.”
The efficiency and condition of California’s transportation system, particularly its highways, is critical to the health of the state’s economy. Annually, $2.8 trillion in goods are shipped to and from sites in California, mostly by truck. Sixty-eight percent of the goods shipped annually to and from sites in California are carried by trucks and another 19 percent are carried by courier services or multiple mode deliveries, which include trucking.
“These conditions are only going to get worse if greater funding is not made available at the state and local levels,” said Will Wilkins, TRIP’s executive director. “Without adequate investment, California’s transportation system will become increasingly deteriorated and congested, hampering economic growth and the quality of life of the state’s residents.”